Processing is simple, a task only requires one touch for removal from view. The first touch is indicative of the user experience in general. For my money, what makes Things 3 worth recommending is a couple of subtleties that mean I spend less time managing my task list. I’m not going to run through all of its features, there are better places for that. I never felt like I had it configured very well, so the temptation to reconfigure always hovered. This is a major strength if you need that kind of detail, however, with so much configuring, and fiddling to get it right, it can also be a headache. If you get it right you can contextualise your workload with extremely specific queries. Getting the most from it requires one to configure projects, labels, and priorities to facilitate query filters built around those different pieces of metadata. I found the flexibility of Todoist equal parts powerful and beguiling. While these new automation features are getting all the attention right now, it’s a couple of subtle, but significant design choices that make Things 3 so effective. Subtleties Subtle design elements make Things 3 a pleasure to use And yet, Things 3 is both an app I would rather spend time using, and one I don’t have to. Ironically, my biggest concern over both those features was the possibility for double handling and time wasting. With nothing left to miss, one can enjoy all the benefits delivered by clever design choices, and opinionated simplicity.
#Scrivener 3 for mac high sierra code
Cultured Code appear wise to this, having created a link building tool on their website. It’s not that it’s difficult to grasp, more that building the links themselves can be tedious. It’s true the barrier to entry for URL based automation is a little higher than web automation. Or for any other kind of work that includes creative planning. This makes a lot of sense for academic work, research, and writing. Being able to delineate notes, mind maps, or outlines into actions opens up all kinds of possibility for continuity. More than that, there is an immediacy to working locally that allows for sharing rich data. In the process it cuts back the surface area of data-sharing with third-parties. Native inter-app automation breaks dependence on the web. Anyone who complains about the ‘extra step’ of pushing a button could look out the window once in a while. I was able to create an analogue of that on iOS, using Workflow. The automation I used most would automatically copy editorial tasks to Trello. By all accounts, the recent addition of a deep, and flexible URL scheme is just the beginning, with other innovations on the way.I would argue that inter-app automation is not just as useful, but in some ways more relevant. To the first point, with native automation Cultured Code has made significant inroads to mitigate some of the abilities lost by not having an API. Things 3 includes very basic natural language parsing for dates If anything, the relative slowdown - minimal as it is - helps add a little more deliberation into the process. I’m not saying I wouldn’t like to see better natural language support added to Things 3 - it does include some basic date parsing abilities - but it doesn’t come close to being the show stopper I thought it might. Never mind that with a keyboard the difference in keystrokes is minimal.
At least I missed that until I realised it’s either a bonhomie for laziness, or an easy way to fill up a task list with lots of nonsense you’ll never do. Second is the natural language parsing for task entry. First, the API allowed me to use Zapier, and/or IFTTT for various automations.
Initially there were two features I missed from Todoist.
#Scrivener 3 for mac high sierra trial
As it turned out, a trial on macOS convinced me to jump. Between the annually recurrent cost, and various Todoist annoyances, it was worth kicking the tyres. The cost of renewing that sub wasn’t much less than buying the Things 3 suite outright. Thankfully, a genuine reason presented itself when my Todoist subscription was up for renewal. Even if I’m only making excuses, I need more than new and shiny. In truth, I’m generally suspicious of trends, so I tried to avoid it while I still had good reason to. I‘ve only been using Things 3 for a few months. But, should you be wondering, is Things 3 better than Todoist, perhaps this will be useful. I’m not here to run that app down, it remains excellent for many reasons - maybe even better in ways that don’t matter to my workflow. Running pathological optimism means I’ve tried them all, but Todoist got left behind this time round. Inevitably this mean comparison with what I turned over along the way. Now that I’m on the bandwagon, here is my take on what makes it presently the best task manager for macOS and iOS - for me at least.
0 kommentar(er)
